The denominator gap, in dollars.

Industry research and competitor disclosures. Marketplace clipping typically runs 25-45% legit. FORKOFF runs 99.71% on its ledger because filtered traffic is excluded by design.

Because FORKOFF prices on qualified views directly. Filtered traffic doesn't enter the spend equation, so the rate is contractual at $0.003. Marketplaces price on raw views; their effective CPQV inflates as their legit rate drops.

It's the rolling ledger average. Specific campaigns range 99.4-99.9% depending on the brief. The qualification engine writes a reason code on every filtered view, so the rate is auditable.

Yes for any operator that prices on raw view counts. DIY tools (OpusClip, Vizard, Klap) don't fit because they're tool subscriptions, not view-priced . see /vs-opusclip for that comparison axis.

Test it. Run the campaign, sample 1000 random views with a third-party verification tool, count how many pass watch-time, geo, and traffic checks. Most claimed legit rates collapse under audit.

MRC viewability checks whether the ad rendered on screen for ≥1s with ≥50% pixels visible. FORKOFF qualified views check viewability AND watch-duration AND geo AND traffic validity. Stricter denominator.