FORKOFF Clipping for brands.Outcome-priced campaigns for the launches that cannot afford raw views.
Brands pay $0.003 per qualified view . verified watch-time, valid traffic, geo-routed delivery. We design the brief, route the clippers, qualify every view, and send you the audit-ready ledger.
Agencies sell effort. Marketplaces sell volume. FORKOFF sells qualified outcomes.
What counts
as a qualified view.
A view is qualified only when all four checks pass. If any layer rejects it, the view is logged, attributed to a reason code, and excluded from both spend and payout. 99.71% of views on the ledger have cleared all four.
① WATCH
Duration meets the threshold
WATCH
TikTok 1.5s baseline · YouTube 30% retention · Instagram Reels 2s baseline. Threshold is set in the brief.
POLICY
Disputed claims, restricted categories, and policy edges get rejected with a written reason. Never silently filtered.
GEO
Views from non-target countries are logged but never counted. Spillover happens only when the brand authorizes it.
TRAFFIC
Datacenter UAs, viewing patterns, and post-campaign cohorts reviewed. Multi-layer because a single check is gameable.
- Counts as qualified
- ›12s watch on a 30s TikTok in target geo
- ›35% retention on a YouTube Short, India target hit
- ›Real device, real account, all platform signals match
- ›Brand-safe content, no restricted claims
- Does not count
- ›0.4s scroll-by with a real account
- ›View from a datacenter UA in target geo
- ›Geo-mismatched view (UAE viewer, India target)
- ›Disputed brand claim flagged by moderation
Brief intake on day 1. Geo-routed clipper pool live within 48 hours. Auto-settled payouts once moderation clears. Every step on the same audit-ready ledger.
How an operator-grade
clipping agency compares.
Side-by-side against the platforms in market today. Categories chosen by buyer-team request. not picked to flatter us.
| Feature | FORKOFF Clippingoperator-grade | OpusClipself-serve SaaS | Whop / Hoodpaycreator marketplace | Vizard / Klapself-serve SaaS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Counts qualified views (4 checks) | ||||
| Geo-routing | partial | |||
| Moderation pipeline | ||||
| Anti-bot ledger | partial | |||
| Visible payout math (before accept) | ||||
| Pricing model | Per QV ($0.003) | Per raw view | Per raw view | SaaS monthly |
| Best for | B2C + crypto brands | Solo creators | Creator marketplaces | Solo creators |
Honest framing: each platform is best for a different buyer. We name who.
Full buyer's matrix on forkoff.xyz/blogHow much will your campaign cost?
Enter geos, platforms, and budget. We compute an estimate from the FORKOFF qualification model. calibrated against the 12M+ qualified views already on the ledger.
The estimate is a model, not a quote. We send a real one within 24 hours.
Crypto-native consumer brand · India + SEA launch · Q1 2026
Brand anonymized at NDA request · numbers verified by FORKOFF qualification ledger
- Brief
- Drive measurable awareness across India + Southeast Asia
- Target geos
- IN · ID · VN · PH
- Watch threshold
- TikTok 2s baseline · YouTube Shorts 35% retention
- Duration
- 14 days · Q1 2026
- ›4.2M qualified views. out of 6.1M raw submitted (68.8% qualification rate)
- ›99.71% sustained legitimacy across 14 days
- ›142 clippers paid · $7,140 total clipper earnings
- ›$12,600 brand spend · 100% paid on qualified outcomes
- ›Zero charge for filtered or non-qualifying views
What operators say about qualified-view clipping.
Quotes from real buyer-side teams + clippers in the FORKOFF network. Names withheld during the closed beta. First-party attributed testimonials replace these as customers opt in.
Crypto-native brand · ops lead
@operator-anon
Clip economy is moving toward outcome-priced. We pay for verified attention now, not raw impressions. Anything else is selling air.
Agency · paid social strategist
@buyer-anon
Spent $40K on a clipping campaign last quarter. Dashboard reported 80M views. Real qualified watch-time was closer to 6M. The industry needs a real standard.
B2C founder · series A
@founder-anon
If your clipping spend isn't gated by a watch threshold + geo + bot check, you're funding inventory the platforms throw away. Burned us once, never again.
Token launch · growth PM
@growth-anon
Best campaign we ran this year: paid per qualified view, not per raw view. Same budget, 3.4× more retained attention. The unit of account matters.
How are you separating real watch-time from raw view counts on TikTok clipping?
Our agency report shows 12M views. Internal mixpanel pulled in 3.1M sessions. The gap is real and growing. Anyone using a third-party qualified-view ledger?
Operator-grade clipping platforms. Who actually filters bot views before charging?
Burned $80K on a pure-volume campaign last quarter. Looked clean on the dashboard. Three weeks later we're chasing reasons. Anyone running on per-qualified-view pricing yet?
Geo-routed clipping > random pool. Earnings clarity matters.
Switched off the random-pool platforms last month. Hate the lottery. Got onto a managed network where eligibility is in writing before I accept. CPM math is clearer, payouts auto-settle. Glad to take less for clarity.
All quotes are paraphrased from real conversations with brand teams, agencies, and clippers in the FORKOFF beta. Attribution unlocks as customers opt in.
Full coverage on forkoff.xyz/blog →Frequently asked questions
A view that passes four checks set by the campaign brief: watch duration, policy compliance, geo consistency, and traffic validity. If any layer rejects it, the view is logged with a reason code and excluded from both spend and payout.
Most campaigns go live within 24-48 hours of brief acceptance. Faster paths exist for repeat brands with pre-approved rule sets.
Instagram (Reels, Stories, Feed), TikTok (Short-form, LIVE), YouTube (Shorts, long-form), X (video, posts), Facebook (Reels, Video). Each platform has its own qualification thresholds and eligibility rules.
OpusClip and Vizard are self-serve clipping SaaS. you pay for the tool, raw views are not filtered. Whop and Hoodpay are creator marketplaces. they count raw views. FORKOFF is managed and counts only qualified views. Brands pay only on outcomes that pass watch, policy, geo, and traffic checks.
No. Fit, quality, and verifiable performance matter more than raw follower size. Eligibility is platform-specific. see the For Creators section.
Every rejection includes a reason code: policy issue, brief mismatch, format mismatch, or invalid traffic signals. We do not silently filter. silent filtering destroys trust on both sides.
Payout = (Qualified Views ÷ 1,000) × Campaign Rate. You see the rate before you accept the brief. Payout settles automatically once the qualified view count clears moderation.
Yes. FORKOFF can run a campaign on a brand's existing creator roster as a managed layer. The qualification engine + reporting still apply. Useful for brands who want measurement without rebuilding their creator network.
No. Filtered traffic is logged with a reason code and excluded from spend. Brands never pay for traffic that fails any of the four qualification checks.
Yes. Every campaign produces an audit-ready CSV/JSON export with per-view reason codes. Useful for finance review, ad-platform reconciliation, or third-party verification.