FORKOFF/ CLIPPING
Compare · vs Vizard

Vizard: where FORKOFF fits next to it.

AI repurposing tool vs managed qualified distribution.

FeatureFORKOFF Clippingoperator-gradeVizardAI clipping + repurposing SaaS
Operating modelManaged distribution agency.Self-serve repurposing SaaS.
Pricing denominator$0.003 per qualified view (CPQV). only views that pass all four checks. ▸ Denominator gapRaw CPM or tool subscription; no qualification denominator.
DistributionVetted clipper network, geo-routed.Brand-owned.
Audit trailAppend-only ledger, exportable CSV/JSON, per-view reason codes.Dashboard counts; no per-view audit trail.
▸ FORKOFF advantage

Vizard creates clips. FORKOFF distributes them and qualifies every view before charging.

Frequently asked

Different category. Vizard makes clips; FORKOFF runs the campaigns that distribute them. Many brands use Vizard for production and FORKOFF for distribution + qualification.

Outcome-priced distribution. Vizard outputs clips from your existing video; FORKOFF makes those clips earn against a qualified-view ledger. Different points on the value chain.

We don't repurpose ourselves . that's where Vizard or OpusClip fit. We onboard clippers who do the long-form-to-vertical work for the brief.

Vizard is a SaaS subscription. FORKOFF is per-qualified-view ($0.003 CPQV) with a $500 sandbox. Different denominators . Vizard you pay for the tool, FORKOFF you pay for outcomes.

FORKOFF. Vizard tracks clip generation and exports; it doesn't audit views post-distribution. The qualified-view ledger is a FORKOFF-specific feature.

Vizard. FORKOFF is brand-side (the spend side). Creators apply to the FORKOFF clipper network as a separate pathway.

Keep reading

Continue exploring related pages.

See the qualified-view ledger for yourself.

$500 sandbox. 14 days. Paid only on views that clear all four checks.